Looking for the latest stories? We're now at cironline.org

high-speed rail

Bullet train bidder has history of cost overruns

SACRAMENTO – The lowest-bidding partnership for the first segment of California’s high-speed rail line includes a firm with a history of cost overruns and costly lawsuits.

The California High-Speed Rail Authority on Friday announced that the American joint venture of Tutor Perini/Zachry/Parsons was the “best apparent value” with a low bid of $985 million – below the $1.09 billion bid by the next-lowest bidder.

On construction projects in California, the lowest bidder has a strong advantage in the eventual selection process. Rob Wilcox, a spokesman for the authority, declined to comment on bidders as the matter is finding its way to the authority’s board of directors.

“Five world-class teams competed for this opportunity, and the process is ongoing,” Wilcox said.

 

The first segment of the estimated $68 billion system is proposed to run 28 miles from Madera to Fresno in the San Joaquin Valley.

According to an August report by The Bay Citizen, sister site of California Watch, 11 major projects in the San Francisco Bay Area completed by Tutor in the last dozen years cost local governments $765 million more than they expected, or 40 percent above the initial bids.

A company spokesman did not return a message seeking comment. CEO Ron Tutor said in the August report that attacks against him were unfounded and overruns were caused by contracting agencies changing the projects in midstream.

Comments

Comments are closed for this story.

via Twitter

Winning bid to start high-speed rail far below estimates

A trio of American companies outbid four other teams of contractors vying for the contract to build the first segment of California's proposed high-speed train system in the San Joaquin Valley – and for several hundred million dollars less than state engineers estimated.

The consortium of Tutor Perini Corp. of Sylmar, Zachry Construction Corp. of Texas and Parsons Corp. of Pasadena offered the low bid of less than $1 billion. Five construction teams submitted bids in January to the California High-Speed Rail Authority for the first stretch of the rail line from east of Madera to the south end of Fresno.

Engineers for the rail authority – the state agency in charge of developing the statewide train system – had at one time estimated that the 28-mile portion would cost between $1.5 billion and $2 billion to design and build. More recent estimates suggested the bids would likely come in at $1.2 billion to $1.8 billion.

 

The Tutor Perini/Zachry/Parsons bid of $985,142,530 was deemed the "apparent best value" by the rail authority, based on a total score that considered both the price and the technical expertise of the competing companies. While Tutor/Perini/Parsons had the lowest technical score of the five bids – 20.55 out of 30 possible points – it also racked up 70 out of 70 points in the financial assessment.

The other four bids were:

Comments

Comments are closed for this story.

via Twitter

Rail authority says revised report won’t slow construction

The California High-Speed Rail Authority says it’s still on track to start construction in early 2013 on the first stretch of its proposed line in the Fresno area – even though it essentially reset a major portion of its approval process.

A revised draft environmental report issued Monday for the authority’s Fresno-to-Bakersfield section will endure two months of public comment and hearings. After that, consultants will prepare responses and write a final version, which is not likely to be certified by the authority’s board until at least January.

Agency spokeswoman Lisa Marie Burcar said the authority anticipates getting bids from would-be contractors in September, and hopes to pick the winning bid and award a contract in late 2012 for its first construction package – from southern Madera County to American Avenue south of Fresno.

 

Burcar said that because the agency approved its Merced-to-Fresno environmental documents in May, construction could begin north of downtown Fresno soon after a contract is awarded. Until the authority certifies the Fresno-Bakersfield stretch, however, the contractor won’t be able to do any work south of downtown.

The first construction package is expected to be worth $1.5 billion to $2 billion. The project includes building 12 street overcrossings or underpasses, two elevated viaducts, a tunnel and a bridge across the San Joaquin River. Laying the tracks will be done later under a separate contract.

Comments

Comments are closed for this story.

via Twitter

Ex-bullet train booster calls new plan 'mangled,' perhaps illegal

Even as the state Senate voted last week to approve California’s $68 billion high-speed rail plan, opponents filed yet another lawsuit to stop the controversial construction project.

Former California High-Speed Rail Authority Chairman Quentin Kopp, who led a 20-year fight for the bullet train, said he believes this latest lawsuit poses a real threat.

The compromise high-speed rail plan crafted by Gov. Jerry Brown and approved Friday is a “mangled” – and probably illegal – version of the project state voters enacted in a 2008 initiative, Kopp said in a phone interview.

“They have distorted high-speed rail and twisted it into (providing) money for commuter rail services,” he  said.

Kopp is not a party to the suit but said he was familiar with its assertions. His comments are of note because for decades – first as a San Francisco legislator and then as rail authority chairman – he was among the California's leading advocates for high-speed rail.

“I can’t say it was unnecessary to get the votes, but it’s not high-speed rail,” Kopp, who also is a retired judge, said of the compromise plan. “It violates (the initiative) in at least four respects and maybe five.”

 

In a statement, rail authority CEO Jeff Morales said the rail plan enacted last week – including its expenditures on commuter rail service in the Bay Area and Southern California – was "fully in compliance" with the bullet train law enacted by voters, called Proposition 1A.

Comments

Comments are closed for this story.

via Twitter

Some senators want dramatic shift in bullet train plan

Three months ago, Gov. Jerry Brown hit the reset button on the California bullet train, slashing $30 billion from its $98 billion budget and promising to reorder the controversial project’s priorities.

Now, some Democrats in the state Senate want to hit the reset button again.

They have proposed dramatically shifting the high-speed rail project’s focus by cutting back on planned construction in the Central Valley and instead spending billions on immediate rail improvements in Los Angeles and San Francisco. 

It is not clear whether what lawmakers call “Plan B” – a proposal devised by state Sen. Mark DeSaulnier, D-Concord, chairman of the Transportation and Housing Committee  – has a real chance of being substituted for the governor’s proposal. The issue will be settled soon, as the Legislature is expected to vote this week or next on whether to issue $6 billion in bullet train construction bonds.

The Senate Democrats’ skepticism about the present high-speed rail plan was first reported by the Los Angeles Times

Boosters say Plan B would spend money now to achieve high-impact upgrades of rail service in the state’s busiest transportation corridors while building infrastructure that would accommodate bullet train service later on.

According to rail advocates who have been briefed on the idea, Plan B’s top priorities include:

Comments

Comments are closed for this story.

via Twitter

Governor backs away from bullet train fight

Gov. Jerry Brown backed away from a fight with environmentalists yesterday, abandoning a plan to exempt the $68 billion California bullet train project from environmental laws.

Brown had hoped to fast-track construction of the controversial project by sidestepping key provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.

But the idea had put him at odds with most of the state’s green groups.

The Sierra Club, the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Planning and Conservation League were among the organizations that in recent days had strongly criticized Brown’s plan.

 

The Sierra Club had called Brown’s idea “dangerous” and “a political mistake.”

Most of the state’s environmental groups backed Brown in his 2010 campaign for governor. Several green groups have been firm supporters of the rail project, which would link San Francisco and Los Angeles with trains traveling more than 200 miles per hour.

Environmentalists said they were informed that Brown was abandoning the plan by Ken Alex, director of the governor's Office of Planning and Research.

Brown’s press office referred questions to the state High-Speed Rail Authority, which declined to comment.

Brown’s decision removed potential roadblocks to environmental lawsuits aimed at stopping the bullet train.

But the move also might shore up legislative support for the project. For construction to begin, lawmakers soon must approve the sale of billions of dollars in state rail construction bonds.

Comments

Comments are closed for this story.

via Twitter

Judge's first ruling leaves door open for Kings County rail suit

A Sacramento County Superior Court judge's tentative ruling appears to lean against a legal challenge of California's high-speed rail plans, but also gives Kings County and two of its residents a chance to fix deficiencies in their lawsuit against the state.

"I guess you could say the court split the baby," said Michael Brady, a Redwood City attorney representing Hanford farmer John Tos, homeowner Aaron Fukuda and the county. "The worst news would be if the court (ruled against us) without leave to amend our complaint."

The tentative ruling doesn't take effect until after both sides present oral arguments in a hearing June 22 in Sacramento.

Tos, Fukuda and the county are suing the California High-Speed Rail Authority, Gov. Jerry Brown and other state officials in hopes of derailing the start of construction of the statewide high-speed train system in the central San Joaquin Valley. Unlike other lawsuits over the $68.4 billion project – which focus on whether there has been sufficient analysis of the system's environmental effects on cities, homes, businesses, farms and wildlife habitat – this case attacks the legality of the project under Proposition 1A, the $9.9 billion high-speed rail bond approved by voters in 2008.

 

The suit, filed last November, contends that the high-speed rail plan is ineligible to receive money from Prop. 1A because it fails to live up to the law's requirements.

Comments

Comments are closed for this story.

via Twitter

'No document exists' on bullet train's speed, lawsuit claims

California’s $68 billion bullet train is supposed to travel from San Francisco to Los Angeles in less than two hours and 40 minutes.

That speed – an average of more than 140 mph, including stops – is a legal requirement, written into the state voter initiative that gave the project the go-ahead in 2008.

Boosters continued to promise that the train would attain those speeds even after Gov. Jerry Brown cut $30 billion from the project’s budget earlier this year, forcing a reconfiguration that seemed likely to slow down the train.

But according to a lawsuit filed by project opponents, the state High-Speed Rail Authority has not done any studies or written reports to verify that the trains actually will go fast enough to follow the law. The suit, filed by the County of Kings Board of Supervisors, quotes a May 31 email from a project official as saying that “no document exists” to verify that the train can meet its travel time deadline.

Instead, the rail authority’s promises are backed up by “verbal assertions based on (the) skill, experience and optimism” of project engineers, the rail official wrote in response to a request for public information.

That statement “casts great doubt on the credibility” of the claims the authority is making about the bullet train, Kings County says in the lawsuit, which seeks a court order to cut off state funding for the project. The county claims constructing the rail line will wreck thousands of acres of prime Central Valley farmland.

Comments

Comments are closed for this story.

via Twitter

Experts say rail plan improved, but still flawed

An independent panel of transportation and finance experts says the latest business plan for California’s proposed high-speed train system is a big improvement from last fall, but still gives cause for concern.

Uncertainty over money to finish the 520-mile system between San Francisco and Los Angeles after initial construction and lingering doubts over what it will cost to operate the train line are among warnings to legislators by the High-Speed Rail Peer Review Group.

If the project falters after building a $6 billion section from Madera to Bakersfield – where construction could start this year or early next year – California would have a partial system of limited use, wrote Will Kempton, the panel’s chairman and CEO of the Orange County Transportation Authority.

“It would be a poor use of resources and an embarrassment,” he added, “but not a financial disaster.”

The panel’s sharpest criticism was aimed at the authority’s ability to oversee such a big project.

 

“We continue to believe that management resources are inadequate to supervise the enormous contracting effort,” said Kempton, who is also a former state director of the California Department of Transportation, “and that attempts to launch a massive construction program in response to federal completion deadlines will only make the problem worse.

“We believe the project should not proceed until a plan for resolving this challenge is prepared” and accepted by the rail authority and Gov. Jerry Brown.

Comments

Comments are closed for this story.

via Twitter

Rail authority policy to purge e-mails draws critics' ire

A congressional committee is investigating California’s $68 billion bullet train project. The U.S. Government Accountability Office is investigating, too.

Meanwhile, this proposal for the largest public works project in California history is the target of a flurry of lawsuits filed by local governments and opposition groups.

All those investigators, lawyers and bullet train critics want to pore over the California High-Speed Rail Authority’s trove of documents, looking for evidence.

So it’s an unusual time to purge five years’ worth of bullet train project e-mails, critics say. Nevertheless, that’s what the agency is contemplating.

In February, the rail authority filed papers with the state saying it intended to enact a new policy to destroy its e-mails after 90 days.

Then, on May 1, in response to a request for information from a project critic, the rail authority said it could not produce e-mails that were older than 90 days, citing the new policy.

The rail authority’s lawyer downplayed the issue’s significance, but it has caused concern among high-speed rail critics, who say they fear the authority is jettisoning important information about how the expensive project is being shaped.

The new e-mail policy is “highly suspect,” said Kathy Hamilton of the Community Coalition on High Speed Rail, a San Francisco Peninsula group that opposes the bullet train. The project would link San Francisco and Los Angeles with trains traveling up to 220 mph.

Comments

Comments are closed for this story.

via Twitter

© 2013 California Watch   /  development:  Happy Snowman Tech   /  design: