Looking for the latest stories? We're now at cironline.org

Eight percent of U.S. babies born to illegal immigrants

Pew Hispanic Center

Illegal immigrants constitute about 4 percent of adults in the United States, but they gave birth to about 8 percent of babies in 2008, according to a study published yesterday by the Pew Hispanic Center.

The findings, based on 2009 census data, reveal how illegal immigrants differ from the overall American population in age, fertility and marriage.

"This is a population of young, working families. That's what drives these birth numbers," said Jeff Passel, co-author of the study and senior demographer at the Pew Hispanic Center, a nonpartisan research group in Washington, D.C.

The median age of illegal-immigrant adults is 35.5, compared with 45.9 for legal immigrants and 46.3 for American natives, the study found. Of illegal-immigrant adults, 45 percent live with a spouse or partner and a child or children, compared with 34 percent of legal immigrants and 21 percent of U.S.-born adults. 

About 85 percent of the parents who are illegal immigrants are Latino, Passel said. Foreign-born Latinos also have higher rates of fertility than their U.S.-born counterparts, whites, blacks and Asians.

"You have an accumulation of people here, so they're here, they form families and then they have kids," Passel said.

Children born in the U.S. are citizens, regardless of their parents' legal status. Nationwide, 7 percent of children under 18 years old, or 5.1 million kids, have at least one parent in the country illegally. Of those children, 79 percent were born here, the study found.

The study comes amid heated debate in Washington over whether to change the 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to anyone born in the country.

A nationwide survey in June by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, an affiliate of the Pew Hispanic Center, found 56 percent of people oppose such an amendment, while 41 percent support it. A more recent poll by CNN found an even smaller margin, with 51 percent opposed and 49 percent in favor.

The controversy began when Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told Fox News that "people come here to have babies. They come here to drop a child. It's called 'drop and leave.'" Graham has proposed that birthright citizenship no longer apply to children of illegal immigrants.

Research by the Center and others does not support Graham's "drop and leave" claim.

The Center reports that among illegal immigrants who give birth, more than 80 percent have been in the country for at least a year or more. 

Douglas Massey, a Princeton University sociologist who has surveyed Mexicans who come the U.S. illegally, told PolitiFact that "no one ever mentioned having kids in the U.S." as a reason for migrating. Overall, about 59 percent of the country's illegal immigrants come from Mexico, according to the Center.

I've been surveying Mexican immigrants to the U.S. for 30 years as part of the Mexican Migration Project. We don't ask people their reasons for migrating because most people cannot really articulate the reasons very well – you get simple answers like, 'I came for the money,' but that doesn't tell you much because people can want money for all kinds of reasons. But we do ask about their migratory behavior, which we then link to social and economic conditions on both sides of the border. What our work shows is that migrants come in response to labor demand in the U.S. and are motivated by economic problems at home.

Still, the Center's study brings needed attention to birthright citizenship, said Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, a research group in Washington that supports reduced immigration.

"I'm skeptical of changing our citizenship rules," Krikorian said. "My concern is that it's really a symptom; it's not a problem. You have to fix the problem … the problem being too much illegal immigration."

American-born children don't automatically mean parents become citizens. Once they turn 21, and if they meet certain financial requirements, children may sponsor their parents. However, parents who immigrated illegally must return to their home countries for up 10 years before applying.

Still, Krikorian said, "Now that they have kids, even though it doesn't create any automatic legal right to stay here, it does create a political pressure, or political difficulty, in deporting people."

Because children of illegal immigrants qualify for public programs, they are a major source of the cost of illegal immigration, Krikorian said.

Based on 2002 census data, the Center for Immigration Studies calculated that households headed by illegal immigrants cost $10.4 billion more than they contributed in taxes. Among the largest costs were Medicaid, food assistance, federal prison and court systems, and federal aid to schools.

The nation's illegal immigrant population – about 12 million in 2008 – plateaued during the recession, the Pew Hispanic Center reported. California is home to 2.7 million illegal immigrants – more than any other state – but its share of the population is falling as migration spreads throughout the nation, particularly in southeastern states.

What the number and distribution of the illegal immigrants means for the future newborn population is unclear, Passel said. The Center plans to release a follow-up study later this month examining the population size and settlement patterns of illegal immigrants.

"If there's still going to be a lot of people here, they're still going to have births," he said.

 

Comments

Comments are closed for this story.
Brittanicus's picture
We should all remember that instant citizenship under the misuse of the 14th Amendment doesn't end with taxpayers awarding illegal immigrant Mothers with the cost of giving birth? The actual expense commences after the baby is born, as the parents can collect welfare for the baby and access to low income housing. Afterwards the Mother who is always permitted to stay, even though she triggered a criminal act, now her husband and other children and parents can domicile in a section 8 home. Once settled the cycle isn't over, as if she intentionally becomes pregnant again, knows those extra mouths to feed will also become the taxpayers burden. An sample of these costs is fully described in the Spring issue of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons 2005. Its available for all to read and will certainly depress you, and then activating a rising fury that you are paying each year from your taxes, to accommodate thousands of illegal expectant mothers of foreign countries from around the world. The 14th Amendment must corrected, that one family member must be a citizen.. Consider this factual story from a report Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons 2005. of one illustrative family to show how reality is the sum of the seen and the unseen. The Silverios from Stockton, California, are illegal aliens seen as hard-laboring fruit-pickers with family values. Cristobal Silverio came illegally from Oxtotilan, Mexico, in 1997 and brought his wife Felipa, plus three children aged 19, 12, and 8. Felipa, mother of the bride Lourdes (age 19), gave birth to a new daughter, her anchor baby, named Flor. Flor was premature, spent three months in the neonatal incubator, and cost San Joaquin Hospital more than $300,000. Meanwhile, Lourdes plus her illegal alien husband produced their own anchor baby, Esmeralda. Grandma Felipa created a second anchor baby,Cristian. Anchor babies are valuable. A disabled anchor baby is more valuable than a healthy one. The two Silverio anchor babies generate $1,000 per month in public welfare funding. Flor gets $600 per month for asthma. Healthy Cristian gets $400. Cristobal and Felipa last year earned $18,000 picking fruit. Flor and Cristian were paid $12,000 for being anchor babies. This illegal alien family’s annual income tops $30,000. Cristobal Silverio, when drunk one Saturday night, crashed his van. Though he had no auto insurance or driver’s license, and owed thousands of dollars, he easily bought another van. Now consider that FAIR (Federation for American Immigration Reform) Illegal Immigration expenditures have reached $113 Billion annually, prejudiced Drain on U.S. Taxpayers. With an addition of $60 billion of illegal wages spirited out of the country as a legal remittance, with the compliments of numerous American banks. With probably the highest jobless rate since the great depression, it is estimated by FAIR, that 8.5 million illegal alien labor is still employed this side of the border. Not only has each subsequent president refused to build a solid obstacle, along the perimeter of our national border. But in most places it doesn't even exist. The colonization of foreign nationals would never have happened, if the 1986 administration had honored its promise to the American people of enforcing employment laws and deploying the National Guard along the fence (s) . Since the inception of the Simpson/ Mazzoli bill in Congress every administration has neglected the laws. Now we have transplanted whole neighborhoods from other nations, which have culminated in Sanctuary cities. In the majority of these illegal alien havens, the prosecution of these people has waned. By tolerating these umbrellas of sanctuary cities and communities unknown numbers of citizens and legal residence have been murdered. Arizona and the city of Phoenix have been inundated with illegal national crime that as a border-state stepping stone of drop houses where thousands of impoverished people has spread to every niche around the country. So is it that a pregnant female can procreate here and have even more children, that owing to the misconstruction of the 14th Amendment the babies become instant citizens and then the family have an immediate stay of deportation and once again the welfare offices beckon the mother and an abundance of freebies are given. In California--a Sanctuary State is another border states with a massive population of illegal immigrants. California has tried to cater to literary millions of foreign households has brought the state to the very edge of bankruptcy. If the state was not overrun with illegal immigrants billions of dollars would be saved, and would be available to the rightful citizens This misplaced loyalty of elected officials supporting other countries poor, would have partially healed that states economy as with many other states. These extra costs have tabled many important health care, eye services and dentistry to the real citizenship and permanent residents. Look to your own states before it’s too late and throw out all incumbents, who are pushing for another Amnesty catastrophe. Many more millions will be ready to rush the border, should Sen. Harry Reid and his associates would have Obama sign this new law. The banner across the world will bring even more paupers, thinking that sometime yet another amnesty will be evident. Call your Senator and Representative at the Capitol or at the state level not to vote for any Amnesty at 202-224-3121 NumbersUSA has many answers? SOME MODERN COUNTRIES THAT RECENTLY ENDED THEIR BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP POLICY * Canada was the last non-U.S. holdout. Illegal aliens stopped getting citizenship for their babies in 2009. Australia's birthright citizenship requirements are much more stringent than those of H.R. 1868 and took effect in 2007.New Zealand repealed in 2006. Ireland repealed in 2005. France repealed in 1993.India repealed in 1987.United Kingdom repealed in 1983.Portugal repealed in 1981 America is the laughing stock of the industrialized nations. Only the U.S. values its citizenship so commonly as to distribute it status haphazardly to the progeny of foreign citizens visiting Disneyland or other entertainment mecca. Or a tourist, worker, student with visas from other foreign lands, who have violated their promises to leave once their visa expires, as well as to those who sneak across our national borders. THE 14th AMENDMENT NEED NOT BE CHANGED, JUST THE INTERPRETATION OF THE LAW? IT WILL SAVE AMERICA BILLIONS OF DOLLARS A YEAR. H.R. 1868 by Rep. Gary Miller of California would merely change the federal law (passed by Congress) that currently requires giving U.S. citizenship to these babies. Today we should only be giving citizenship to the babies of whom either the Mother or Father holds US citizenship?

via Twitter

© 2013 California Watch   /  development:  Happy Snowman Tech   /  design: