Ex-BART cop got big break at sentencing, records show

spotreporting/FlickrA mural of BART shooting victim Oscar Grant.

Johannes Mehserle, the former transit police officer who shot an unarmed* man on an Oakland BART platform, wants the judge to set him free pending appeal.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Robert Perry already gave Mehserle a big break at sentencing, state prison records show.

After a trial moved out of Oakland on a change-of-venue motion, Mehserle was convicted of involuntary manslaughter for killing BART passenger Oscar Grant, 22, on New Year’s Day.

The judge set the former officer’s total sentence at 24 months. On average, people convicted of manslaughter in California serve more than eight years in prison – four times Mehserle’s sentence.

That’s according to “Time Served on Prison Sentence,” a statistical report [PDF] by the state Department of Corrections. It details, by offense, how much prison time Californians who were paroled in 2009 had served on their felony convictions.

The data shows that Californians who haven’t killed anybody routinely do more prison time than the sentence Mehserle faces.

People convicted of armed robbery served 54.5 months – more than double Mehserle’s term. People convicted of selling controlled substances served 33 months.

Californians who spent 24 months in state prison – Mehserle's sentence – had been convicted of such crimes as assault and battery, escape, or possession of controlled substances for sale.

The data reflects only the primary felony for which a criminal was sentenced and not additional convictions that could enhance prison time.

The data also doesn’t distinguish between those convicted of involuntary manslaughter, as was Mehserle, and the more serious crime of voluntary manslaughter.

Mehserle was among police deployed to the Fruitvale BART station early on New Year’s Day after reports that a fight had broken out on a train. He shot BART passenger Grant in the back while Grant lay on the platform. Grant had been arrested on suspicion of resisting arrest, and officers said they were attempting to handcuff him when the shooting occurred. Passengers took video of the shooting on cell phone cameras.

Mehserle has been in jail since the incident. As the Oakland Tribune’s Tammerlin Drummond has noted, Mehserle is likely to serve only seven more months in prison. With credit for time served and good-time credits, his total time behind bars is likely to be about 17 months.

That’s slightly more than the prison time served by people convicted of second-degree burglary or petty theft.

At trial Mehserle said the shooting was a tragic accident – he had meant to zap Grant with a Taser, fearing that the suspect had a gun in his pocket. Grant didn’t have a gun.

Judge Perry said Mehserle showed “tons of remorse,” the San Francisco Chronicle reported.

The judge also said he didn’t believe there was a racial component to the killing. Mehserle is white, and Grant was African American. By law, involuntary manslaughter is punishable by a prison term of two, three or four years. But the jury found that Mehserle had used a gun in commission of a felony -- an enhancement that might have added 10 years to his sentence. But defense lawyer Michael Rains argued that the use finding was inconsistent with the involuntary manslaughter verdict, and the judge struck that portion of the verdict, as the AP reported.

The hearing on Mehserle’s bail request is set for Friday.

Here, drawn from the corrections report, is time-served data for felons paroled in 2009, expressed in months behind bars:

 

# paroled

Average term in months

Murder 1st (Pre 11-8-78)

26

382.3

Murder 1st

23

324.6

Murder 2nd

115

292.8

Attempted Murder 1st

20

210.8

Homicide

687

134.4

Attempted Murder 2nd

206

116.4

Kidnapping

166

116

Manslaughter

341

100.8

Rape

242

79.1

Sodomy

33

78.9

Oral Copulation

73

78.2

Lewd Act With Child

1,238

61.9

Penetration With Object

66

60.6

Murder 2nd (Pre 11-8-78)

1

57.9

Robbery

3,299

54.4

Sex Crimes

2,856

46.7

All Crimes vs. Persons

15218

45.5

Controlled Sub. Manufacturing

222

43.3

Vehicular Manslaughter

181

37.6

Burglary 1st

2,006

37.5

Assault w. Deadly Weapon

3,427

36.9

Arson

142

33.9

Controlled Sub. Sales

2,117

33

Assault

8,210

32.7

All felonies grand total

63760

25.8

Drug Sales Related

9,745

25.5

Other Assault/Battery

4,557

24.9

Controlled Sub. Possession For Sale

6,246

24.3

Escape

44

24.3

Mehserle sentence

 

24

Burglary

6713

23.1

Other Sex

1,204

21.1

Drug Crimes

19,122

21

CS Other

406

20.7

Marijuana Sale

291

20.3

Other Offenses

2,211

19.9

Vehicle Theft

3,350

19

Other Crimes

8,348

18.2

Possession Weapon

3,725

18.1

Other

6,392

18

Forgery/Fraud

2,096

17.6

Meserle Actual Term (est.)

 

17

Burglary 2nd

4,707

17

Petty Theft With Prior

2,999

16.8

Theft

7,967

16.3

Possession

9,377

16.3

Grand Theft

2,341

16.2

Controlled Sub. Possession

8,819

16.1

Receiving Stolen Property

2,627

15.9

Driving Under Influence

2,226

15.6

Other Property

946

15.5

Marijuana Other

109

14.4

Hashish Possession

43

14

Marijuana Possession For Sale

869

13.5

*This corrects an earlier version that mistakenly said Grant was handcuffed. Officers were attempting to cuff him when the shooting occurred.

 

Filed under: Public Safety, Daily Report

Comments

Comments are closed for this story.
hophop's picture
thanks man nice share )
Libby214's picture
Well this article accurate in that the charge Manslaughter serves on the average of 8 years. BUT Mehserle wasn't convicted of Manslaughter, he was convicted of Involuntary Manslaughter, a big and significant difference. The maximum sentence for Involuntary Manslaughter is 4 years and the avergae time served is 32 months. Nice try at an inflammatory article, good to see Cali Watch expanding out! /
Lancent's picture
"The data also doesn’t distinguish between those convicted of involuntary manslaughter, as was Mehserle, and the more serious crime of voluntary manslaughter."

That would make any inferences meaningless.

However, there is one item which is a form of involuntary manslaughter -- Vehicular Manslaughter -- which carries an average sentence of 37 months, according to the data.

(It's even hard to make inferences from that because we don't know if it includes drunk driving homicides, which should get stiffer sentences.)

jefff's picture
Just 11 words in you have a gross error based on the facts of the case. I stopped reading..... Mr. Grant was not handcuffed at the time of this horrific accident!
Nuh uh's picture
Reverse the situation and the killer would get the death sentence. In reality, it was cold blooded murder, and the killer has been getting preferencial treatment from the time of the murder, including from the jury.
bengirwb's picture
A dumb article. The Bart cop was sentenced by a judge who said he was convinced that the shooting was accidental. That the cop mistakenly pulled his gun instead of his stun gun. In another case, Bernie Madoff was sentenced to 150 years. A life sentence if there ever was one. He didn't even slap anybody. Now that's a really unjust sentence.
Jack Bauer's picture
Well, "Nuh uh", killing a cop is a death sentence offense. There is no scenario where Oscar Grant could have "accidently" shot the cop. Grant can't carry a gun, therefore, it would be a crime...probably murder. Not preferencial treatment, just the legal system actually working for once. Just because a bunch of people are pissed off a white cop shot a black thug, doesn't make it murder. The cop (dumbass cop) pulled his 9mm instead of the Taser and shot the guy. No intent, no murder. You don't like it, change the law. I hate these friggin bloggers writing these racially biased, fact stretching articles and then call them journalism. Joke. JB
Nicagee's picture
You can skew your opinion by not using the accurate info. Where is INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER on Lance Williams BIG LIST of crimes? It's NOT there! What a surprise if you don't want ppl to know that there's a difference between voluntary and INvoluntary manslaughter. I've followed this case in the news since it happened. Oscar Grant was no angel and had a big hand in what went down that day. Don't act like a jerk, threaten fellow passengers on a train and violently resist arrest when confronted with your wild actions. He'd be alive today if he wasn't being aggressive and abusive. Ppl like him make the Bart communte an unpleasant and dangerous experience when all that the rest of us want to do is get to wherever we're going and back in one piece.
joubaur's picture
Should have kept him in Oakland where he'd have gotten a fair trial!
Ivan_Grosniy's picture
Mehserle was convicted of INVOLUNTARY manslaughter. The MAXIMUM sentence for involuntary manslaughter is 4 years, which would result in 2 years being served. The middle range is 3 years, which equates to 18 months time served. That is very close to the 17 months estimated for Mehserle. You have either used the average sentence for VOLUNTARY manslaughter or else lumped them both together. There is a big difference, because voluntary manslaughter requires an INTENT TO KILL. That you started out by misreporting that Grant was handcuffed before being shot further supports an inference that California Watch is biased. I have to suspect that you are being deliberately inflammatory. That is irresponsible.
TVC's picture
Lets go back to see why a Taser was even needed in the 1st place. How many officers were at the scene, 4 or 5? One man face down, with a large officer on top of him, other officers next to him, and they can't cuff this guy ? That said, how can a guy logically reach into his pocket, pull a gun, and shoot the officer that has him subdued on his stomach? Did all the officers there, agree Grant should be tased? No other officer could assist Mehserle in cuffing Grant? All I can see is gross negligence by the officers present. Of course I'm basing my thoughts on the media reports. Also, how can a trained officer not know the difference from a Taser and a 9mm pistol, and why are both carried in the same proximity of each other on an officers belt, as to avoid any mistake that occurred in this instance. People make mistakes and the rule of thumb is you pay for your mistakes, if you are alive to do so. How do you pay for a fight in public compared to (accidentially) shooting someone? I had a nephew who's best friend took a shotgun out of his truck in Florida at wilderness party and fired a round into the air. A parent of one of the teens in attendance tackled my nephews best friend and the shotgun went off and shot my nephew in the head killing him. 2 families living in tragedy. My nephews best friend is serving 5 (count em), years in prison. His sentence will actually be with him the rest of his life for his mistake. Oh, no charges against the parent who tackled him that set the gun off. This comment is not anti-Police or anti-justice, but PROTECT AND SERVE has many variables, and so does the justice system
Kennx7's picture
I would have held out for the full 2nd degree murder had I been on that jury. I base this on 3 factors: 1. He shot the man in the back. 2. The man was unarmed. 3. The man was already on the ground, subdued and face down. This was clearly an "execution" to show the other blacks lined up next to Grant that he meant business. The just sentence would have been 14 years. (I am white...)
AJB's picture
hmmm - I'd like to respond to the stereotypical term "black thug" by Jack Bauer used for young black males - as well as Nicagee's statement as well. That's inappropriate and adds fuel to the fire. I guess we may never get the full story, however witnesses on the train state that a white male aggressor had Grant in a headlock and while Hispanics were also involved, the Zafiratos only reported to the train operator black males were involved. In fact Grant had just called his girlfriend who was waiting for him at the BART station and told her they were being attacked. Suppressed at the hearing was Merserle's history of altercations with people of color, in high school and while on the force. Had Merserle not changed his story several times, maybe the "involuntary" would have seemed credible. Justice in this country isn't always about the truth - it's how well the case is argued/represented. Sometimes the system gets it right, but often in cases like these there is great room for improvement. When an injustice occurs - mistake or otherwise, unless the penalty is fair, there is no closure. This case has sent a strong message to young men of color, and the community in which they reside, that there is no justice and that we can be victimized without penalty. So, how do we, as a community fix this?

via Twitter

© 2013 California Watch   /  development:  Happy Snowman Tech   /  design: