Looking for the latest stories? We're now at cironline.org

Hospital chain, union that scrutinized it are both political donors

SEIU photoSEIU Rally, Los Angeles

The Southern California hospital chain under investigation for suspected Medicare fraud – and the labor union that blew the whistle – have both made significant political donations to officials with roles, present or prospective, in the probe.

As disclosed Tuesday by California Watch in partnership with the Los Angeles Times, Ontario-based Prime Healthcare Services is being investigated by state and federal authorities in connection with high rates of septicemia, or blood poisoning, reported among Medicare patients at the 13-hospital chain.

The probes began in response to a computer analysis by the Service Employees International Union. The union represents thousands of health care workers nationwide and has repeatedly clashed with Prime over workers’ wages and benefits.

The SEIU contends the chain’s high septicemia rates likely reflect “upcoding” – a type of fraud in which a provider falsely claims to have treated a complicated infection to qualify for premium reimbursement rates from Medicare. Prime says it has done nothing wrong and contends the SEIU made the allegations to leverage a labor contract at a Prime hospital in Inglewood.

In all, there are three investigations under way: by the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; by the state Attorney General’s Bureau of Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse; and by the state Department of Public Health.

Both the hospital and the union are major political donors in California. Some donations have gone to officials who played roles in initiating the probes – or who might play a role depending on how events unfold:

Jerry Brown, Attorney General and Democratic candidate for governor. As attorney general, Brown is in charge of what an aide has called the “criminal investigation” of Prime, conducted by the Bureau of Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse. If Brown is elected governor, he would supervise the state Department of Public Health.

This year SEIU affiliates have spent more than $4.6 million to elect Brown governor, most of it on an independent expenditure campaign.

Meanwhile, Prem Reddy, Prime’s CEO, has donated $51,800 to Brown’s campaign for governor, the maximum allowed for an individual donor in the primary and general elections.

Last month Prime Healthcare donated $32,900 to the state Democratic Central Committee, which also is electioneering on behalf of Brown.

In 2006, through a foundation, Reddy donated $100,000 to an Oakland charter school founded by Brown.

The donations “didn’t in any way influence” the probe by the attorney general’s office, said Sterling Clifford, Brown’s campaign spokesman.

Kamala Harris and William Cooley, candidates for attorney general. The winner of the election will inherit the attorney general’s probe of Prime.

Records show Reddy has donated $6,500 to Harris, a Democrat and present district attorney of San Francisco, while an SEIU political action committee gave her $25,800, records show.

Reddy also donated $5,000 to Cooley, the Republican D.A. of Los Angeles.

Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Los Angeles. The lawmaker, chairman of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, co-authored a letter that led to the federal probe of Prime.

In 2009, the SEIU’s political action committee donated $5,000 to Waxman.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. As governor he supervises the state Department of Public Health, which recently announced it too was investigating Prime. In April, Reddy gave $50,000 to one of the governor’s political committees.

Meg Whitman, GOP candidate for governor. If elected, she will name a chief for the Department of Public Health.

Prime Healthcare has donated $25,900 to Meg Whitman, Brown’s Republican opponent in the governor’s race, and gave $75,200 to the state Republican party, which is campaigning for Whitman.

 

Comments

Comments are closed for this story.
Happy Non-Union Healthcare Worker's picture
Nobody has a chance to stand-up to the unions. They have become the almighty and powerful. They tell everybody how they ought to run their businesses. Unions are outspending one of the largest employers in the State by a factor of 1300 % in just one election cycle. I would like to see what the Unions have actually done for the employee, how much of the monies do unions spend helping their members that are in foreclosures, bankruptcy, seeking higher education. Employers often pitch in paying for education, advancing loans in employees in tough times, providing living quarters, but we don’t see any news about unions doing something similar to their members. All we hear are union funds being swindled by bosses, funds being extravagantly spent on campaigns facilitating further expansion of the unions. Unions are a total sham.
jskdn2's picture
Unions have made a practice of using laws intended for other purposes to exact concessions to their own wants. An example are environmental lawsuits against developments when the goal is to secure labor agreements tied to those projects.

via Twitter

© 2013 California Watch   /  development:  Happy Snowman Tech   /  design: