Looking for the latest stories? We're now at cironline.org

More First 5 groups challenge state budget

MIKI Yoshihito/Flickr

The First 5 commission in Los Angeles announced yesterday that it will sue the state over legislation that transfers $1 billion from early childhood development programs to state health services.

First 5 LA joins a growing list of commissions challenging the legislation, signed by Gov. Jerry Brown last month.

Four First 5 county commissions – Fresno, Madera, Merced and Orange – filed suit earlier this month. The Riverside and Solano commissions, both organized as county agencies, have recommended their county boards of supervisors pursue litigation on their behalf. First 5 Kern is considering joining or filing a lawsuit as well.

First 5 was established in 1998, when voters approved Proposition 10, the California Children and Families Act. The initiative placed a 50-cent tax on tobacco products to fund development programs and services for children ages 5 and younger. 

Any changes to the act must be approved by voters or, as long as amendments further the act and are consistent with the purpose and intent of the initiative, by a two-thirds vote of the Legislature. In addition, Proposition 10 revenue can only supplement services or fund entirely new programs; it cannot replace state or local general funds, or pay for existing levels of service.

In their lawsuits, the commissions contend that the funding shift goes against the initiative's intent because it would supplant existing state health services, without voter approval. First 5 LA, which has not yet filed its suit, will argue the same.

"We adamantly oppose redirecting monies intended to be used at the local level, to Sacramento," Michael D. Antonovich, First 5 LA commission chair and Los Angeles County mayor, said in a statement. "These are local dollars and should be controlled locally."

Because more births occur in Los Angeles than in any other county, First 5 LA receives the largest share of Proposition 10 revenue each year. That also means it stands to lose more money than any other commission – more than $424 million.

Collectively, First 5 LA and the four county commissions that have already filed suit hold nearly half of the $1 billion sought by the state. The state budget requires them to shift half their fund balances – nearly $498.8 million all together – by June 30, 2012.

UPDATED 11 a.m. April 15, 2011: First 5 Solano announced that the Solano County Board of Supervisors has directed its attorneys to initiate litigation against the funding shift. The county may join other commissions in an existing lawsuit or file its own. 

Under the state budget, First 5 Solano must transfer about $8.8 million of its funds to the state. The commission approved up to $100,000 for legal fees earlier this month. 

"While I can think of 100,000 things our children need more than spending $100,000 on legal action, it's a small price to pay to keep $8.8 million here in our community," said commission chair Danny Ayala.

 

Comments

Comments are closed for this story.
Ruben111's picture
First 5 already gave them $133 million to pay for these or similar services last year, so there is a clear precedent for the move of funds. ALSO - supplantation as an issue only matters if there are other dollars that can be used to fund the programs. Since, if they do not take the First 5 funds, there will be no Medi-Cal services, it is not supplantation. Since two First 5 Exec Directors have been quoted as either not having any plans to sue OR that they have "no real argument against it" AND Since Rob Reiner, the originator of Prop 10, supports the $1 billion move and if he thought it were illegal, he'd be up and arms (and he is not) then why sue if there is "no real argument" and Section 8 of the law alllows for it? Perhaps it's to get around restrictions on how much can be spent on marketing? This way the commissioners get to spend as much OF THE TAXPAYERS' money to try to save funds for mainly THEIR OWN agencies. This is what happens when you write into a law that the foxes can guard and eat from the henhouse. They really seem to think it is their money - it's not, it's the taxpayers' money.
drbrender's picture
What part of we don't have enough money to run the state don't they understand. Also why can't parent's take care of their own kids for the first five years until they start kindergarten. First 5 is nonsense and based on flawed and faked research. Spending $100,000 on lawyers when the money could have actually been spendt on our children is criminal. Sue, sue, sue. The only ones making money here are the lawyers. When they are all done they will lose and nothing will be accomplished. The state is broke! You want your kid to do well. Pay for it yourself!
Ruben111's picture
It's just unconscionable that the First 5 people think they should not use these funds pay for Medi-Cal kids. Their marketing has only shifted from using kids as the photo op to using "the voter" as the poster child for their self interested ways. It's just shameful.
BRodriguez's picture
This is just more PR - these guys got my ears burning... daycare is more important than Medical? My butt.

via Twitter

© 2013 California Watch   /  development:  Happy Snowman Tech   /  design: