Salary scandal in Bell shines light on impound cash

Police are supposed to keep the streets safe. In Bell, it appears, the police department also expected officers to keep the city’s coffers filled.

As part of a policy ostensibly to deter gang activity, the Los Angeles Times reported on Monday that Bell patrol officers aggressively pursued unlicensed motorists. Officers there – in the wake of the city's salary scandal – say they operated under quotas for how many arrests to make, traffic tickets to write and cars to impound each day. [Update: La Opinion first reported the Bell Police Department's impounding policy and the revenue it generated.] 

Oran Viriyincy/Flickr

California law permits police to seize for 30 days cars driven by people without licenses. Police across the state are impounding a huge volume of vehicles.

It’s unknown exactly how many, but the California Office of Traffic Safety documented [PDF] 108,050 30-day impounds in 2008 at sobriety operations (checkpoints, saturation patrols) alone.

Cities collect impound release fees. Increasingly, local governments also get a cut of the revenue that tow companies charge car owners for moving and storing seized vehicles, California Watch reported earlier this year.

The 30-day impounds, however, face a legal challenge from the owners of impounded cars who argue the law violates the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. At question is whether the impounds are a constitutional administrative penalty for violating state law.

The lawsuit, Salazar v. Maywood, awaits oral arguments before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals later this year.

As the Times showed in Bell, with the impound law in effect, the dollars pile up:

Impounding cars, usually because the drivers are unlicensed, has been a steady revenue stream in Bell for years. In the last fiscal year, the city expected to make more than $770,000 from release fees, which would amount to between 2,000 and 2,500 impounds per year. The previous year, the department made more than $834,000.

The city charges unlicensed motorists a $300 fee to release the car; those charged with driving under the influence are charged $400. The number does not include costs imposed by the impound lot, which starts with a $104 base fee and increases $27 per day.

Bell’s release fee is higher than most other of the state’s cities, but is nowhere near the highest. Oxnard’s police department charges drivers $495.  

Similarly, while Bell might offer an extreme example of the practice, California cities have long been aware of impounds’ profit potential.

In 2000, the University of California, Berkeley Institute of Transportation Studies published step-by-step instructions on how to implement a “winning” impound program.

The instructions were based on an examination of how the city of Upland took over towing and storage from private firms. Impounds, the report shows, are revenue positive:

Upland's vehicle impound program is financially self-supporting. Annual revenues from impound fees total about $700,000. In fact, analysis of revenues, fees, and the number of impounded vehicles for Upland indicates that revenues can easily exceed operating costs (including estimated wages and lost ticket revenues due to police officers conducting vehicle impound enforcement instead of writing traffic tickets). Upland's vehicle release fees go into a ‘traffic offender fund,’ which was retained by the Police Department to continue operating the vehicle impound program. The balance of the revenues (minus tow and lien sale processing fees, which are ‘pass through’ fees) goes directly into the city's general funds.

The instructions did not discuss how such an impound program might shift a police departments’ priorities.

“It really changed our culture,” Bell police Sgt. Art Jimenez told the Times. “Rather than being police officers and being proactive looking for crime, we were out there looking for vehicles to impound.”

 

 

Filed under: Public Safety, Daily Report

Comments

Comments are closed for this story.
Pilarin28's picture
It was not the LA TIMES who broke this story. it was LA OPINION, a spanish daily newspaper in Los Angeles. Here is the FIRST STORY http://www.impre.com/noticias/2010/8/1/multas-en-bell-son-un-negocio-202... and the SECOND STORY http://www.impre.com/noticias/2010/8/1/multas-en-bell-son-un-negocio-202... It would be so gratifying if colleagues actually recognized the work that ethnic media does. This is a 2 newspaper town, and one of them is read by half a million people in SPANISH The LA TIMES had this story a month later than we did and everybody is saying they broke it. IT´s beyond me, unless we live in a paralell universe. Oh wait, yes we do, it´s called, the latino community and its mother language. It is a paralell universe where most mainstream media do not ever dare go... Thanks Pilar Marrero Senior reporter La Opinion
Pilarin28's picture
It was not the LA TIMES who broke this story. it was LA OPINION, a spanish daily newspaper in Los Angeles. Here is the FIRST STORY http://www.impre.com/noticias/2010/8/1/multas-en-bell-son-un-negocio-202... and the SECOND STORY http://www.impre.com/noticias/2010/8/1/multas-en-bell-son-un-negocio-202... It would be so gratifying if colleagues actually recognized the work that ethnic media does. This is a 2 newspaper town, and one of them is read by half a million people in SPANISH Thanks Pilar Marrero Senior reporter La Opinion

via Twitter

development:  Happy Snowman Tech   /  design: