State board re-examines statewide rights for charters

The State Board of Education will hold a public hearing today to discuss what has become a thorny question: Under what circumstances should a charter school company be allowed to bypass local district control and operate statewide?

The board has granted statewide status to three charter school organizations since 2006: High Tech High, Pacific Technology School and Aspire Public Schools.

The privilege is a boon to charters. It allows the organizations to start schools wherever they see fit in California, without the risk of being rejected by local school authorities. Some charters see state oversight as better for them financially. Aspire, for example, has been able to pass millions in bonds to build their own buildings since acquiring statewide operating status – something that would be nearly impossible to do under the control of a school district.

Under the law, charters can be granted statewide privileges only after proving their services are a "statewide benefit" that cannot be provided by "locally approved" charters.

But last July, the California Court of Appeals determined the state board awarded Aspire Public Schools statewide status in 2007 without examining whether the charter could meet the necessary requirements. The ruling, prompted by a lawsuit by the California Teachers Association, California School Board Association and others, has forced state education to reassess.

Lupita Alcala, deputy superintendent at the California Department of Education, said until state education officials can tweak the rules granting statewide status, Aspire should be allowed to operate existing schools, but be blocked from opening new facilities.

The organization currently operates six "statewide benefit" schools – two each in Sacramento, Huntington Park and Stockton.

"The regulations are not clear on what constitutes a statewide benefit charter," Alcala said. "We are asking the board delay but hold harmless Aspire. We want a solution that would benefit all schools so we won't find ourselves in another litigation situation."

Documents filed with the board show Aspire is asking the board to reinstate their statewide privileges now. Jed Wallace, president of the California Charter School Association said he is supporting Aspire's fight to get its statewide rights restored in full.

"Aspire is trying to come forward with new and innovative ways to get high quality schools," Wallace said. "We think Aspire makes a very compelling case."

 

Filed under: K–12, Daily Report

Comments

Comments are closed for this story.
Caroline Grannan's picture
It would be useful to know what kind of oversight the state provides to its charter schools -- if any. The current trend in the California charter world is to call for oversight and accountability (after fighting those very things vigorously for years), but what is the situation? By the way, Oakland blogger Sharon Higgins has found a suspiciously enormous gap between the Academic Performance Index at one Aspire school (a hair shy of the gold standard of 800) and its students' dismal SAT scores. Discuss among yourselves. http://perimeterprimate.blogspot.com/2011/01/not-all-its-cracked-up-to-b...
Allen Osborn's picture
Don't be confused by these unions, suing to essentially shut down charters is nothing but a power grab. For good reason the CTA and their locals are threatened by charters because they don't have to be unionized. The CTA is using money stolen from taxpayers, laundered through teacher paychecks - including my own - to limit the choices parents have in determining their kids' education. Enslaving teachers, students, and communities is what unions do. Unions care more about money and power than they have ever cared about educating children. They cannot justify their actions to the public so they subvert parental choices through the courts. How many unionized schools don't meet API and have "dismal" SAT scores? Probably more than one. Education in California is broken and unions are to blame for a lot of that because they have been running the schools for a generation. Charters need the chance to succeed and that success is the biggest threat to unions - hence the litigation.

via Twitter

© 2013 California Watch   /  development:  Happy Snowman Tech   /  design: