Looking for the latest stories? We're now at cironline.org

Food waste remains persistent problem at farms, grocery stores and restaurants

Farmers, restaurants and supermarkets throw away millions of tons of edible food each year at a time when a growing number of Californians struggle to put food on the table.

State studies have found that more than six million tons of food products are dumped annually, enough to fill the Staples Center in Los Angeles 35 times over. Food is the largest single source of waste in California, making up 15.5 percent of the Golden State’s waste stream, according to the California Integrated Waste Management Board.

An examination by California Watch and the Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism at USC found shortcomings along California's food distribution chain that allow vast amounts of food to go to waste in landfills, despite laws and tax incentives that encourage food donations. The problems persist at every step.

Among the findings:

  • Millions of tons of fruit and vegetables rot in fields and orchards or are plowed over each year. Some of these edible crops are left behind because they are misshapen or discolored. Gleaning programs rescue only a small portion of the field waste.
  • Major retail grocery chains are more likely to throw away fruits, vegetables and even entire hams and roasts than donate to distribution centers. Although federal and state laws protect grocers from liability, many stores expressed concerns that donated food could sicken recipients, even if it has yet to reach its expiration date. While some major chains donate food, others do not.
  • Restaurants dump tens of thousands of tons of edible food every year. The vast majority of the state’s 90,000 restaurants and eateries do not participate in food donation programs.

Waste is not just an issue for corporate chains and mom-and-pop eateries. Discarded food represents a quarter of all waste tossed away by California households.

A certain amount of waste is inevitable in all forms of business. It's built into the economics of every production and manufacturing cycle – whether it is clothes-making, homebuilding or newspaper printing. But the commodity of food takes on added significance, experts say. Health officials, researchers, economists, farmers and corporate leaders interviewed for this project say that more efficient production and distribution of our food could help feed millions of families.

“Waste is built into the food chain, at all levels,” said Jonathan Bloom, author of an upcoming book on food waste and of the blog Wasted Food. “On the whole, the amount of food we waste is ridiculous, especially when you consider the number of Americans who experience hunger every day.”

Numerous volunteer organizations work to “re-harvest” California’s vast produce landscape and divert edible food that would be wasted from grocery stores and restaurants into California's food banks and soup kitchens.

“It’s a win-win situation,” said Arlene Mercer, founder of Food Finders, a Long Beach-based food recovery group that collects donations from supermarkets and restaurants for food pantries. "They can receive a tax writeoff, people will be fed, and it will stop food waste.”

Many of California's farms, grocery store chains and restaurants donate millions of pounds of food each year to help the needy. They are spurred by good will, green initiatives and relentless demands to cut costs, including food waste disposal.

“When it comes to feeding people, there's no competition,” said Lilia Rodriguez, a spokesperson for Albertsons, whose Fresh Rescue program makes hard-to-get dairy and meat products available to food banks. “We feel like if we don't do it, who will?”

But, Mercer and others say too many opportunities are missed to divert food to the hungry before it is thrown away.

The problem starts in the fields.

Gleaning efforts capture small percentage of produce

California’s carpet of farmland spans 25 million acres and produces about half of the nation’s fruits, nuts and vegetables, according to the California Department of Food and Agriculture.

Although no one can estimate exactly how much food is left in the fields, experts say it amounts to millions of tons of produce, much of it plowed under after every harvest.

Though farmers pride themselves on efficiency, they also run businesses that are subject to weather and market forces. If a farmer can't sell a crop for a price that pays for the harvest or if some of it doesn't meet the retailers’ cosmetic requirements, the crop goes to waste. It doesn't matter if the produce is edible.

“Waste is inevitable,” said Mike O’Leary of Boskovich farms in Ventura County. “We try to minimize it, but sometimes fields have to be disked,” resulting in good foods being plowed under.

Some farms try to cut their waste by donating produce to food banks. This year, Del Monte Foods Co. donated more than two million pounds of bananas and cantaloupes to Ventura Food Share.

Millions more pounds are rescued from the plow blade by gleaning groups all over the state that deliver “second harvest” crops to food banks for distribution to local meal and pantry programs. The California Association of Food Banks, which represents 45 food banks, has distributed more than 60 million pounds of food through its Farm to Family gleaning program.

But those efforts are only so successful. During one recent gleaning operation, about 10 percent of an estimated 140,000 pounds of carrots left above ground were rescued, according to Christy Porter, founder of Coachella-based Hidden Harvest, which hires low-income farm workers to glean locally grown food.

“We couldn’t go fast enough to get the product before it spoiled,” she said.

A 2004 study by anthropologist Timothy Jones estimated that up to 10 percent of certain crops, such as cauliflower, never leave the field. He projected that the overall figure for crop waste in the United States is closer to 20 percent.

Farmers dispute such figures, claiming much higher efficiency.

“We’re not in the business of leaving commodities in the field,” said Scott Deardorff of Deardorff Family Farms in Ventura County. He estimated that food left in the fields is closer to 5 percent. Many farmers account for a 5 percent loss as part of their business operations to cover food that is left in the field, losses due to bad weather and other factors. But even 5 percent of the produce could help feed thousands of California families.

Programs like Hidden Harvest have recovered millions of pounds of food yearly. But obstacles prevent more gleaning efforts, including a need for more volunteers and liability concerns from farmers worried that gleaners might be injured in their fields.

Some grocers reluctant to donate food

Some of the nation’s major grocery chains are reluctant to donate much of the food leftover each night because of liability concerns.

John Wadginski, 24, saw this first hand.

While in college Wadginski worked at a Safeway store deli in Davis. The amount of food he tossed into the trash every night still bothers him.

“I had to throw out 10-pound hams that weren’t even touched,” he said. “It was easily 50 pounds of food a night.”

Wadginski asked his supervisors if he could volunteer to take the food to a local shelter.

State and federal laws have been in place for more than a decade to protect businesses and individuals from criminal and civil liability should recipients become ill from food donations. But grocery stories are still worried.

“They told me no because if anything happened, they would be liable,” Wadginski said.

The 1996 federal law protects all donations made in good faith. States have similar statutes. The only exceptions are gross negligence or intentional misconduct. A plaintiff would have to prove that a company or individual intentionally tried to harm another person by making a donation of food they knew to be unsafe.

“Many of them don’t understand,” said Mercer of Food Finders. “We try to educate them that they are protected by the Good Samaritan laws and our insurance and that neither have ever been challenged.”

Mercer said she faces many initial roadblocks with some chains. They think that it will take too much time or they fear their sales may somehow be impacted by donating, even though donated food is dispersed only through food banks and other nonprofit and community groups.

Most grocery chains participate in some sort of hunger relief program. Safeway and Vons, for example, make donations to Feeding America, formerly America’s Second Harvest. The Los Angeles Regional Food Bank and San Diego Food Bank are major recipients of their donations. But chains often limit donations to bakery items – the kind of foods hunger organizations need the least. Other stores hesitate or refuse to donate perishable items, like produce and meat.

Safeway and Vons spokesperson Teena Massingill acknowledged concerns about liability as a reason why meats and other spoilable items aren’t donated.

“Safeway does not donate items that are not fit for consumption or could be unfit for consumption when they reach the final recipient,” Massingill said. “Once the items are out of our control, we cannot guarantee that they will be kept under the specified temperatures.

Food recovery groups say they are trained in food-handling practices. They want the food to get safely into the hands of the hungry as much as the donors do. With needs so great, the food is unlikely to sit around for long.

Costco sends about 45 million pounds of food each year to compost, its own records show. The chain has no company-wide food recovery program. Mercer of Food Finders said that though she has approached the company, Costco has chosen not to participate, instead offering her discounts on the food she buys for the programs and occasional free turkeys.

Albertsons was the first food chain to start a formal perishable food recovery program. In the Fresh Rescue program, stores within the Albertsons chain can partner with an organization in their community to receive food from the supermarket. Each store has one or two employees trained and designated to work with partner agencies.

“Stores have been doing it on their own for a few years now, but we wanted to find a way to pull it all together,” said Lilia Rodriguez, the public affairs manager for Albertsons. “It’s eggs, cheese, milk, fruits – and it’s those products that are really hard for food banks to get a hold of. Non-perishables are usually what they get.”

Rodriguez said the chain feels protected by the federal and state Good Samaritan laws but also urges its partner agencies to take precautions transporting food.

At Ralphs, the chain launched a new program to distribute food that has reached its “sell-by” date but remains edible. The program is now in place in two-thirds of Ralphs stores. The company hopes to expand it all stores by this spring.

Restaurants say they have little waste

More than 90,000 eating and drinking establishments operate in California, according to the California Restaurant Association. But fewer than 1,000 restaurants donated last year through Food Donation Connection, which is by far the largest program that links food service donors with hunger relief agencies. The 940 California restaurants that participated in 2009 included nearly 400 Pizza Huts, more than 100 KFC locations and more than 100 Chipotle Mexican Grill establishments.

“They think it is going to take too much time, too much effort and companies aren’t willing to invest more time now to do things even though there is a financial upside to donating their surplus food,” said Steve Dietz, director of business for Food Donation Connection.

A big part of the reason why so few restaurants participate is because most are mom-and-pop operations or single-owner franchises, which are not eligible for the additional tax deduction for food donations, Dietz said.

Only major corporations and large franchise owners, called “C Corporations, are eligible for the deduction. A temporary allowance for small businesses expired at the end of 2009. Food Donation Connection and Feeding America are working with Congress to resurrect the tax deduction and make it permanent for all businesses.

A 2006 study by the California Integrated Waste Management Board showed that food makes up 51.4 percent of waste disposed of by fast food restaurants and 66.1 percent of waste disposed of by full-service restaurants.

While not all of that food is recoverable and edible, agencies that feed the hungry said these numbers are devastating.

“The amount of food that is wasted is heart-breaking to me because it can be harvested,” said Louise Morris, the food coordinator at Shining Light Ministries in Garden Grove. “People are hungry and it’s just thrown away.”

Click here for the spanish version.

This story is the result of a collaboration between USC’s Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism and California Watch, a project of the Center for Investigative Reporting. The 13 reporters are graduate students at USC Annenberg.   

To see more of the students' work go to http://hungerincal.uscannenberg.org

This story was edited by Mark Katches and copy edited by William Cooley.
Filed under: Health & Welfare


Comments are closed for this story.
sgandersen's picture
We state that food donations made in good faith are generally exempt from liability. Yet the flood of tort litigation in California - much of it based on alleged "technicalities" - drowns out the voice of reason. I'm saddened by - but don't blame - the paranoia of grocery chains.
typaldos's picture
Fascinating story. I have wondered about restaurant and grocery store food waste, but didn't know much about it. A friend of mine works at a chain of grocery stores...I'm going to pass this story to her.
Chris's picture
Food waste is a nationwide issue. Faith Mission is a 501c 3 non-profit organization based in New York. Our organization has been operating since 1969 serving the poor and needy through our soup kitchens in Nassau and Queens Counties. Faith Mission is seeing an all time high in demand for food by the needy and continues to rise. While we have doubled our efforts and donations and volunteers have increased, we are struggling to keep up with the demand. Despite the tax deduction and the Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act (see law below), our community supermarkets were only willing to donate 1 day old bread and bakery goods due to concerns about liability. The California Watch article is relevant and timely. Just this week our community supermarket has decided to discard the bread and bakery good and not donate the bread to any soup kitchen due to liability concerns. We are surprised as there have been no incidents of litigation or any complaints by anyone involving our organization. The loss of the donated bread from our local supermarket will have a tangible impact on our ability to serve the poor. In my opinion the supermarkets are not the problem as I believe they'd like to donate the food, but their concerns of liability may be valid. However I'm not sure. Would California Watch and USC Annenberg consider researching if there actually has been any litigation filed against supermarkets in connection with donated food? The data may assist supermarkets to assess their true risk of litigation or encourage our lawmakers to close any loopholes in the Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act to protect the supermarkets. Our brothers and sisters in need are counting on us. http://www.usda.gov/news/pubs/gleaning/seven.htm http://www.usda.gov/news/pubs/gleaning/appc.htm
Evening Dresses's picture
so Nursing Homes that reduce spending on staffing, will get less reimbursement. The system does not reward Nursing Homes for reducing staffing levels. No money if given to the facilities for increased staffing, the facility has to spend the money, and then get reimbursed. The current system rewards facilities that increase staffing levels. We both agree that most facilities (75%) are increasing staffing, and reducing turnover. Well, if facilities increase staffing their staffing costs go up and in turn (at least 18 months later), reimbursement rates are going to go up. They get rewarded.
Mr Medium's picture
Liability concerns... What other excuses can they come up with? So out of 10000 loaves of bread or 1000 hams or any of 1000s of other products one person MIGHT file suit, even if they stand almost no shot at winning many organizations are unwilling to donate. Going by the same standard then why bother selling in the first place? I'm sure nearly everyone has purchased an item from the 'day old sale" or from a 'scratch and dent" section. Even more have bought spoiled milk from time to time and the vast majority just chalk it up to not paying attention when shopping, but that still doesn't force stores to shut down their business out of fears of liability. The real issue is plain greed and the thought that they're not in business to give anything away even IF a large number of their customers are showing up to scrape every penny just to feed their families. They just don't care and those who do play that game really should be exposed not just in articles such as this, but in regular advertisements and articles. Every pantry ought to place posters of stores and organizations who refuse to help under any circumstances so that when the patrons do have money to buy food they'll know not to buy the food from the stingier retailers.
Clear Path's picture
The Federal and State Government has chosen to "Dump" sludge (treated human waste, and industrial waste) on the Farmland, to reduce landfills, at the same time we are throwing food away in the dump?? It seems to me the Government "IN THEIR WISDOM" is throwing the Baby out with the Bathwater! Let us re-think the system and become accountable! Most fruit and vegetables that have blemishes actually taste better! Businesses should be "Mandated" to send their perishables including MEATS to Non-Profit food banks! The dumps should be restricted "not to accept food or agriculture". The agriculture should go to farms that raise livestock - pigs, etc, or to Bio-treatment to turn it into fuel. When the agriculture businesses apply for crop loss -subsidy- from the Government let them show what was grown, and where it went! Their should also be recognition for the businesses that donate their food so the public will recognize them and want to shop there (maybe a certification displayed in the window). If they have credits from farmers, and food banks, or fuel enhancement programs, then and only then they get assistance or recognition! CHECKS AND BALANCES!
atomone's picture
Faith Mission is seeing an all time high in demand for food by the needy and continues to rise. The agriculture should go to farms that raise livestock - pigs, etc, or to Bio-treatment to turn it into fuel. When the agriculture businesses apply for crop loss -subsidy- from the Government let them show what was grown.And health care for people.
majedG's picture
People goes to the bank to make transactions. These transactions include opening a savings account or a loan account. Through these transactions, people are charged certain amount for the services rendered to them. Bank fees are the ones that individuals are trying to avoid but these fees are what the financial institutions are using as a huge source of immediate cash. These fees are continuously increasing, and that is one thing we need to know about bank transactions.

via Twitter

© 2013 California Watch   /  development:  Happy Snowman Tech   /  design: